Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52011 - 52020 of 64166 for records.
Search results 52011 - 52020 of 64166 for records.
Elton K. Feffer v. Town of Delavan
in the record provides a basis to conclude that she acted under necessitous circumstances in selling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11322 - 2005-03-31
in the record provides a basis to conclude that she acted under necessitous circumstances in selling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103997 - 2013-11-12
and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103997 - 2013-11-12
State v. Peter D. Wicker
, 53 (1996) (“if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
, 53 (1996) (“if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
Amendment. We have searched the record and our own correspondence file to determine whether Kloostra has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
Amendment. We have searched the record and our own correspondence file to determine whether Kloostra has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that we may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110987 - 2014-04-29
, and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that we may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110987 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
because we find no evidence, either from Marcelle’s brief or from the record, to indicate that Marcelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
because we find no evidence, either from Marcelle’s brief or from the record, to indicate that Marcelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not believe this was grounds for dismissal, but wanted to make a record nonetheless. The County responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230345 - 2018-12-12
not believe this was grounds for dismissal, but wanted to make a record nonetheless. The County responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230345 - 2018-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
questions about the testimony, but rather just wanted to read it into the record. The court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39950 - 2014-09-15
questions about the testimony, but rather just wanted to read it into the record. The court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39950 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Lee
with accepted legal standards and facts of record. Id. ¶4 The first new evidence was from Derrick Singleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
with accepted legal standards and facts of record. Id. ¶4 The first new evidence was from Derrick Singleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
revealed Jordan’s criminal record and his employment at an illegal nightclub. Kohler also believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28357 - 2014-09-15
revealed Jordan’s criminal record and his employment at an illegal nightclub. Kohler also believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28357 - 2014-09-15