Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52031 - 52040 of 74899 for public records.
Search results 52031 - 52040 of 74899 for public records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
State v. David W. Stokes
it to create a record of substantial intoxication, which would have assisted the Defendant's defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
it to create a record of substantial intoxication, which would have assisted the Defendant's defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support on an imputed income of $50,000. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143005 - 2017-09-21
support on an imputed income of $50,000. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143005 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
, or of November 8, 2001, in the record. The only order material to this appeal is the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
, or of November 8, 2001, in the record. The only order material to this appeal is the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a canine sniff of the vehicle for drugs. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
a canine sniff of the vehicle for drugs. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
State v. John E. Triplett
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). No. 97-1550-CR 2 based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12544 - 2017-09-21
. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). No. 97-1550-CR 2 based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
, or of November 8, 2001, in the record. The only order material to this appeal is the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5129 - 2017-09-19
, or of November 8, 2001, in the record. The only order material to this appeal is the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Scott G. Biesterveld v. Mark W. Roob
on Roob appears in the appellate record. It is unclear whether October 15, the actual date of service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3122 - 2017-09-20
on Roob appears in the appellate record. It is unclear whether October 15, the actual date of service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3122 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131913 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131913 - 2017-09-21