Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52051 - 52060 of 57669 for id.
Search results 52051 - 52060 of 57669 for id.
State v. Steven J. Royce
and that action is appropriate. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5306 - 2005-03-31
and that action is appropriate. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of discretion standard.” Id., ¶6. A court properly exercises its discretion where it “examined the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
of discretion standard.” Id., ¶6. A court properly exercises its discretion where it “examined the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of record and reaches a reasonable result. Id. In all actions to modify legal custody or physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2012-10-09
of record and reaches a reasonable result. Id. In all actions to modify legal custody or physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87863 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
not be done, however, “unless there is some improper or coercive conduct by the police.” Id. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
not be done, however, “unless there is some improper or coercive conduct by the police.” Id. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
-party complaint ….” This argument is undeveloped. See id. In any event, Wis. Stat. § 180.1502(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
-party complaint ….” This argument is undeveloped. See id. In any event, Wis. Stat. § 180.1502(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, on-the-record explanation of the court’s sentencing decision; an implied rationale is insufficient. Id., ¶¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06
, on-the-record explanation of the court’s sentencing decision; an implied rationale is insufficient. Id., ¶¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion. See id. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592006 - 2022-11-22
discretion. See id. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592006 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assume that the missing material supports the circuit court’s decision. Id. at 27. Without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252033 - 2020-01-07
assume that the missing material supports the circuit court’s decision. Id. at 27. Without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252033 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
objectives, and why the sentence advances those objectives. Id., ¶¶38-39, 40-42. We review sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140995 - 2017-09-21
objectives, and why the sentence advances those objectives. Id., ¶¶38-39, 40-42. We review sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Brownson
be to permit a gross perversion of the system. See id. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2444 - 2017-09-19
be to permit a gross perversion of the system. See id. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2444 - 2017-09-19