Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52081 - 52090 of 84246 for wi.
Search results 52081 - 52090 of 84246 for wi.
State v. Craig P. Helgeland
A sentencing decision is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. See State v. Macemon, 113 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
A sentencing decision is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. See State v. Macemon, 113 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
to show that his plea was not intelligent and voluntary, see State v. James, 176 Wis.2d 230, 236-37, 500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
to show that his plea was not intelligent and voluntary, see State v. James, 176 Wis.2d 230, 236-37, 500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29468 - 2014-09-15
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29468 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20368 - 2017-09-21
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joe M. Janz v. Wisconsin State Labor and Industry Review Commission
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP3017 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20423 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP3017 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20423 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kevin D. Waite
provides no basis for further proceedings. See also Austin v. State, 86 Wis.2d 213, 222-23, 271 N.W.2d 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
provides no basis for further proceedings. See also Austin v. State, 86 Wis.2d 213, 222-23, 271 N.W.2d 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10609 - 2005-03-31
State v. Milton F. Pozo
in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. See State v. Hamilton, 120 Wis.2d 532, 541, 356 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14022 - 2005-03-31
in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. See State v. Hamilton, 120 Wis.2d 532, 541, 356 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Viola Leimbach v. Martin A. Kummer
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
., 180 Wis.2d 221, 226, 509 N.W.2d 294, 296 (Ct. App. 1993). The first step requires us to examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
., 180 Wis.2d 221, 226, 509 N.W.2d 294, 296 (Ct. App. 1993). The first step requires us to examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this state as precedent or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528930 - 2022-06-07
of this state as precedent or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528930 - 2022-06-07