Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 16425 for commenting.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 16425 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
by placing too much weight on the dismissed and non-prosecuted charges. He points to the court’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
by placing too much weight on the dismissed and non-prosecuted charges. He points to the court’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
unsatisfying.[3] It commented that the judge who had authorized the deferred prosecution agreement had taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20
unsatisfying.[3] It commented that the judge who had authorized the deferred prosecution agreement had taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a mistrial. Second, he argues that the admission of a police officer’s testimony that commented on another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
for a mistrial. Second, he argues that the admission of a police officer’s testimony that commented on another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
[PDF]
State v. David M. Womble
argument. No. 99-0773-CR 3 Kimes objected to Mitchell’s comment (on Womble’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
argument. No. 99-0773-CR 3 Kimes objected to Mitchell’s comment (on Womble’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comment on DeBlare’s bond. In response to a question about whether he remembered running out of gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181988 - 2017-09-21
comment on DeBlare’s bond. In response to a question about whether he remembered running out of gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181988 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiencies. Youra emphasizes the following comments made by the court at trial: Defendant’s demeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15
deficiencies. Youra emphasizes the following comments made by the court at trial: Defendant’s demeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the following comments made by the court at trial: Defendant’s demeanor, by sharp contrast, was completely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
the following comments made by the court at trial: Defendant’s demeanor, by sharp contrast, was completely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
Megal Laundromat, Inc. v. Suds-R-Us, Inc.
not be for an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Megal does not comment on this standard-of-review argument. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31
not be for an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Megal does not comment on this standard-of-review argument. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31