Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the analysis hinges on a question of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786241 - 2024-04-09
, the analysis hinges on a question of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786241 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
Kramer Business Service, Inc. v. Hyperion, Inc.
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
Clark County v. Michael C. Collins
is permanently waived. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7542 - 2017-09-19
is permanently waived. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7542 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Matthew R.L.
. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the juvenile court properly interpreted the factors listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the juvenile court properly interpreted the factors listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12457 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13
. Whether evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13
Erna Seidlitz v. Dieter Seidlitz
Dieter’s motion. Dieter then sought and received a de novo review of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31
Dieter’s motion. Dieter then sought and received a de novo review of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31