Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 29412 for er.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 29412 for er.
State v. Linda Lacey
violated; (2) the trial court erred by sentencing her without making a finding of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
violated; (2) the trial court erred by sentencing her without making a finding of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
State v. John S.
an order terminating his parental rights to Stachel S. John claims: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
an order terminating his parental rights to Stachel S. John claims: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 44
to the Mullers as a result of a fire at their sporting goods store. Society argues the court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28190 - 2007-03-27
to the Mullers as a result of a fire at their sporting goods store. Society argues the court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28190 - 2007-03-27
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz
. Klauser argues that the court erred in concluding that, under Wis. Stat. § 856.23(1)(e) (2001-02)[1], she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
. Klauser argues that the court erred in concluding that, under Wis. Stat. § 856.23(1)(e) (2001-02)[1], she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
Marcella Schetter v. Ernie Von Schledorn Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
argument is that the trial court erred by refusing to consider credits due her as part of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10508 - 2005-03-31
argument is that the trial court erred by refusing to consider credits due her as part of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William N. Osberg v. Stephen Kienitz
and Highway Landscapers, Inc. are not eligible for immunity, and therefore the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21695 - 2017-09-21
and Highway Landscapers, Inc. are not eligible for immunity, and therefore the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21695 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fault. We affirm. ¶2 We first address Davis’s argument that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
fault. We affirm. ¶2 We first address Davis’s argument that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2) (2011-12). 2 Griffin argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
(2) (2011-12). 2 Griffin argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ramon H.
that the trial court erred in not conducting an evidentiary hearing on his allegations that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2532 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in not conducting an evidentiary hearing on his allegations that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the appellants’ brief, and one of the issues raised in the appellants’ brief is whether the court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160963 - 2017-09-21
the appellants’ brief, and one of the issues raised in the appellants’ brief is whether the court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160963 - 2017-09-21