Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 64449 for records/1000.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 64449 for records/1000.
Shannon Jeanne Krug v. Theodore Richard Krug
, and a presubmission conference, the parties have submitted memo briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19033 - 2005-07-19
, and a presubmission conference, the parties have submitted memo briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19033 - 2005-07-19
[PDF]
State v. James H.
or to any of the parties.” Based on this statutory language, together with the record facts, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
or to any of the parties.” Based on this statutory language, together with the record facts, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey Townsend
of the record is factually deficient to permit meaningful review, we remand this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
of the record is factually deficient to permit meaningful review, we remand this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144642 - 2017-09-21
record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144642 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105581 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105581 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and Miller appeals. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27928 - 2014-09-15
, and Miller appeals. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we conclude this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we conclude this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
CA Blank Order
, Rodriguez’s response, and after an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
, Rodriguez’s response, and after an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17