Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 84268 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the circuit court examined the four corners of the search warrant affidavit in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192300 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his car for traffic violations. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
violated the Fourth Amendment when they conducted a pat-down search of him for weapons after stopping his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17

[PDF] WI 59
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
may be seized." Id. (citation omitted). ¶42 The DeSmidt case dealt with "whether the search of Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09

COURT OF APPEALS
.” We therefore affirm the judgment granting title in fee simple of the disputed seven-acre strip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84993 - 2012-07-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment granting title in fee simple of the disputed seven-acre strip of land to the Orcutts.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Marvin E. Miller
of examining automobile searches on a case-by-case basis to determine whether valid safety concerns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7831 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Douglas J. Miller
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - added the decisions in case nos. 2008AP2765-CR, 2008AP3170, 2009AP1007
July 11, 2011 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67944 - 2014-09-15