Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 5211 - 5220 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Salenius contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449451 - 2021-11-04
motion. Salenius contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449451 - 2021-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court denied Miller’s motion, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56771 - 2010-11-15
trial based on newly discovered evidence. The trial court denied Miller’s motion, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56771 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen him in shackles as the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85157 - 2012-07-24
to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen him in shackles as the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85157 - 2012-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Jackson claims: (1) his trial lawyer gave him ineffective assistance; (2) the trial court was biased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
. Jackson claims: (1) his trial lawyer gave him ineffective assistance; (2) the trial court was biased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment. After an extensive plea colloquy, the trial court accepted Bates’s no contest pleas and imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43576 - 2009-11-16
of imprisonment. After an extensive plea colloquy, the trial court accepted Bates’s no contest pleas and imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43576 - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by mistakenly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28
. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by mistakenly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
Richard J. Schwarten v. Leslie Smith
of $300 per month for the support of the parties’ two minor daughters. Smith contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5461 - 2017-09-19
of $300 per month for the support of the parties’ two minor daughters. Smith contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5461 - 2017-09-19
John C. Buellesbach v. Mark W. Roob
from a judgment entered in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26026 - 2006-07-31
from a judgment entered in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26026 - 2006-07-31