Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52131 - 52140 of 57894 for id.

Jennifer Lynn Schaefer v. Anthony Wade Schaefer
warrant deviation from this rule, id., here the court had reduced its finding of fact and conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6747 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dwight Treankler, Jr. v. City of Colby
prejudicial effect on the jury. Id. As a result, we will not review Treankler's claims on these matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8141 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Anne E. Schwartz v. Pearl Eloda Schwartz
in favor of the survivor. See id. It is undisputed that the rugs were purchased and delivered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8319 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Johnnie Hunter
, that information on which a sentencing court relied was both inaccurate and prejudicial. Id. at 789, 496 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id. We agree with appellate counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106249 - 2014-01-07

Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. State
. Additionally, all of the communications to the John Doe judge must be made a part of the record. See id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16693 - 2005-03-31

08AP392 State v. Thomas R. Beninghaus.doc
to the person from whom a test is requested. Id. ¶6 This case is controlled by our supreme court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12

State v. Javier Bedolla
” or “no prejudice,” the concept is the same and rejected in Douangmala. See id., ¶¶36-42. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25672 - 2006-07-25

COURT OF APPEALS
of the officer[s’] need to enter against the time needed to obtain a warrant.” Id., ¶28. One of the four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115112 - 2014-06-24

COURT OF APPEALS
it was impossible for the circuit court to grant the default in its exercise of discretion. Id. ¶7 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70087 - 2011-08-22