Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided over the postconviction motion did not preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58995 - 2011-01-18
consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided over the postconviction motion did not preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58995 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Billie C. Smith
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5436 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the private country club. We review probable cause under a de novo standard of review. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28665 - 2014-09-15
of the private country club. We review probable cause under a de novo standard of review. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28665 - 2014-09-15
State v. Henry L. Williams
or to undisputed facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Byrge, 2000 WI 101 at ¶55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31
or to undisputed facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Byrge, 2000 WI 101 at ¶55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
the judgment. ANALYSIS ¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
the judgment. ANALYSIS ¶5 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nkosi K. Brown
). The application of the facts to the constitutional principles is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4936 - 2005-03-31
). The application of the facts to the constitutional principles is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶24. “Whether the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811875 - 2024-06-11
.” Id., ¶24. “Whether the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811875 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when he “ma[de] contact with [Landwehr] in the garage.” At a second hearing, and after reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201515 - 2017-11-07
when he “ma[de] contact with [Landwehr] in the garage.” At a second hearing, and after reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201515 - 2017-11-07