Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 17453 for ex.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 17453 for ex.
State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6323 - 2005-03-31
. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Toua Yang
. The trial court’s decision enjoys a presumption of regularity. See State ex rel. LaFollette v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court’s decision enjoys a presumption of regularity. See State ex rel. LaFollette v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2013AP506 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Kenneth Jaworski v. David
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107662 - 2017-09-21
the following opinion and order: 2013AP506 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Kenneth Jaworski v. David
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107662 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
because postconviction counsel failed to raise them herself. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61048 - 2011-03-14
because postconviction counsel failed to raise them herself. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61048 - 2011-03-14
[PDF]
Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. MARK J. SANTNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7195 - 2017-09-20
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. MARK J. SANTNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7195 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
provide prisoners a protected liberty interest in being granted parole. State ex rel. Gendrich v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644268 - 2023-04-18
provide prisoners a protected liberty interest in being granted parole. State ex rel. Gendrich v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644268 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a party’s waiver or consent. State ex rel. Skinkis v. Treffert, 90 Wis. 2d 528, 535-36, 280 N.W.2d 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58040 - 2014-09-15
by a party’s waiver or consent. State ex rel. Skinkis v. Treffert, 90 Wis. 2d 528, 535-36, 280 N.W.2d 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994) (citing Strickland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161791 - 2017-09-21
and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994) (citing Strickland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶9 Hinojosa also argues that the department is impermissibly applying an ex post facto punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
). ¶9 Hinojosa also argues that the department is impermissibly applying an ex post facto punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352020 - 2021-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
because a sentence modification motion cannot be raised in a § 974.06 motion. See State ex rel. Warren v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22
because a sentence modification motion cannot be raised in a § 974.06 motion. See State ex rel. Warren v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22