Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 83976 for simple case search.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 83976 for simple case search.
[PDF]
denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from a search of his vehicle, and he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from a search of his vehicle, and he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58626 - 2011-01-05
. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58626 - 2011-01-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58626 - 2014-09-15
evidence. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58626 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and dangerous constitutionally reasonable to justify a protective search. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15
and dangerous constitutionally reasonable to justify a protective search. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31785 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutionality of the protective search. McDaniel contends that the recent case of State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31785 - 2008-02-11
to the constitutionality of the protective search. McDaniel contends that the recent case of State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31785 - 2008-02-11
State v. Mark H. Brooks
to search is not tainted by illegality as was the case in Royer. Nor is it necessary that the consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
to search is not tainted by illegality as was the case in Royer. Nor is it necessary that the consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eesi Vang
. Instead, we must look at the evidence sought by the search warrant. In this case, the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11477 - 2005-03-31
. Instead, we must look at the evidence sought by the search warrant. In this case, the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randall S. Handeland
a search under the Fourth Amendment). We conclude that under the circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
a search under the Fourth Amendment). We conclude that under the circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randall S. Handeland
is not necessarily a search under the Fourth Amendment). We conclude that under the circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
is not necessarily a search under the Fourth Amendment). We conclude that under the circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12994 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Rivamonte of the Milwaukee Metro Drug Enforcement Group applied for a search warrant for a particular single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
Rivamonte of the Milwaukee Metro Drug Enforcement Group applied for a search warrant for a particular single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01