Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52201 - 52210 of 82991 for simple case.
Search results 52201 - 52210 of 82991 for simple case.
State v. Charles R. Wincek
favorable recommendation by avoiding any request for time served, that is not necessarily the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
favorable recommendation by avoiding any request for time served, that is not necessarily the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence the court had imposed in another case, and it placed Carter on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
sentence the court had imposed in another case, and it placed Carter on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
offense, and felony bail jumping, without the repeater enhancer. The other charges in this case were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
offense, and felony bail jumping, without the repeater enhancer. The other charges in this case were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974805 - 2025-06-26
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974805 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255640 - 2020-03-02
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255640 - 2020-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
the family court, in that case, properly interpreted the statutory presumption, the question remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
the family court, in that case, properly interpreted the statutory presumption, the question remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
James C. Cotter v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2676-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17303 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2676-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17303 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
2009 WI 44 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP3075 Complete Title: Rudy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36753 - 2009-06-09
2009 WI 44 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP3075 Complete Title: Rudy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36753 - 2009-06-09