Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52231 - 52240 of 83218 for simple case search.
Search results 52231 - 52240 of 83218 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
a sufficient factual basis for the plea. Pulver indicated that he had sufficient time to discuss his case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94666 - 2008-07-25
a sufficient factual basis for the plea. Pulver indicated that he had sufficient time to discuss his case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94666 - 2008-07-25
97-06 ORDERED effective January 1, 2000, SCR 20:3.6(a),(c),(c)(1),(c)3),(c)(7) are amended; 20:3.6(d)and (e) are created, and the Comment to 20:3.6 is amended. FURTHER ORDERED proposed amendment of SCR 20:3.8, is denied.
rules is amended to read: 20:3.6(c)(7) (intro.) In a criminal case, in addition to subparagraphs (1
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2007-07-16
rules is amended to read: 20:3.6(c)(7) (intro.) In a criminal case, in addition to subparagraphs (1
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
therefore summarily affirm. Yancey was charged with numerous felonies in 2019 and 2020 in three cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
therefore summarily affirm. Yancey was charged with numerous felonies in 2019 and 2020 in three cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
therefore summarily affirm. Yancey was charged with numerous felonies in 2019 and 2020 in three cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
therefore summarily affirm. Yancey was charged with numerous felonies in 2019 and 2020 in three cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
CA Blank Order
her pleas. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107554 - 2014-01-27
her pleas. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107554 - 2014-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case are official traffic signs. Craig contends that the traffic signs were not duly authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33826 - 2008-08-25
in this case are official traffic signs. Craig contends that the traffic signs were not duly authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33826 - 2008-08-25
State v. Alexander F. Godlewski
is not relevant in this case. You, the jury, are the sole determiners of the facts and you, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20427 - 2006-02-13
is not relevant in this case. You, the jury, are the sole determiners of the facts and you, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20427 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2005-03-31
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2005-03-31
Steven G. Robillard v. Douglas W. Nardi
. To consider whether an expert’s opinion is based on facts in the case. 2. The standard emergency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2563 - 2005-03-31
. To consider whether an expert’s opinion is based on facts in the case. 2. The standard emergency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2563 - 2005-03-31
Leo Dunlap v. City of Kenosha
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11