Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52241 - 52250 of 82997 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] 97-10 Amendment of SCR 70.36(5); SCR Chapter 75-Appointment, Performance Evaluation, Continuing Education, Discipline & Decisions of Circuit Court Commissioners. See 97-10A Order issued 12/2/98.
’ certification of status of pending cases. SECTION 2. 70.36 (5) of the supreme court rules is created
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1186 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The next day AJ Petroleum filed a summons and complaint in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12

State v. James Welch
extend the stop. With respect to the dog sniff, the court stated that the case law indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31

Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
This case arises out of the tragic deaths of the parents of Madeline R., born January 3, 1997, and Cade E. R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6331 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eric S. Fenz
2002 WI App 244 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 01-1434-CR 01-1435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lester Bowen v. Village of Curtiss
. COUNSELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 This case arises out of the actions of the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3000 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
based on controlling case law. ¶10 In State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, 255 Wis. 2d 1, 646 N.W.2d 834
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112449 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kelly L. McCray
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2746-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Domingo Ramirez
an intercept of a package eventually delivered to the defendant in this case, Domingo Ramirez. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2278 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard P.T.
in this case because the State appeared and substantively argued against the motion without raising any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15426 - 2017-09-21