Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52251 - 52260 of 68291 for law.

[PDF] Jail Crowding: Understanding Jail Population Dynamics
as a result of a contract with another law enforcement agency (such as the U.S. Marshals Service). The average
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/jailcrowdpopdynamics.pdf - 2022-12-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Opening Brief in Support of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senators Proposed Maps
mortara@lawfairllc.com AUGUSTYN LAW LLC JESSIE AUGUSTYN, SBN 1098680 1835 E. Edgewood Dr., Suite
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224openingbriefinsupport.pdf - 2024-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS
evidently has no minimum markup law. Lower prices in Michigan forced stations in Niagara to lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29869 - 2007-07-30

COURT OF APPEALS
for trial. Because joinder was appropriate under the law and facts of these cases, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54868 - 2010-09-27

2009 WI APP 166
from office,” those statements are coerced as a matter of law and may not be used against the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42765 - 2009-11-23

State v. Barry A. Kundert
searches and seizures.” Wisconsin courts ‘“consistently and routinely”’ conform the law of search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12778 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jack L. Cox
and the law relied upon are stated together, leading one to conclude that the court has made a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10135 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶11 The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law which we review independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158226 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
in question requires the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daymon D. Tate
questions of law and fact. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 633-34. We will not disturb the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6148 - 2017-09-19