Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5231 - 5240 of 12223 for 2012.
Search results 5231 - 5240 of 12223 for 2012.
CA Blank Order
. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the order dismissing his petition. Lenz disputed his 2012 state
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142800 - 2015-06-09
. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the order dismissing his petition. Lenz disputed his 2012 state
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142800 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Gilbert on five years of probation. In 2012, Gilbert filed a motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
Gilbert on five years of probation. In 2012, Gilbert filed a motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the right to personally appear at the plea and sentencing hearings. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
the right to personally appear at the plea and sentencing hearings. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
CA Blank Order
the plea colloquy defective. In State v. Brown, 2012 WI App 139, ¶1, 345 Wis. 2d 333, 824 N.W.2d 916, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
the plea colloquy defective. In State v. Brown, 2012 WI App 139, ¶1, 345 Wis. 2d 333, 824 N.W.2d 916, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116388 - 2014-07-08
CA Blank Order
zero days of credit. In July 2012, Pittman moved the circuit court pro se for sentence credit. Pittman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
zero days of credit. In July 2012, Pittman moved the circuit court pro se for sentence credit. Pittman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
CA Blank Order
of the recognized examples of a “manifest injustice.” See, e.g., State v. Cain, 2012 WI 68, ¶26, 342 Wis. 2d 1, 816
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135489 - 2015-02-24
of the recognized examples of a “manifest injustice.” See, e.g., State v. Cain, 2012 WI 68, ¶26, 342 Wis. 2d 1, 816
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135489 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87423 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2012). Slocum then filed the underlying motion to reopen his challenge to the 2008 assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
, 2012). Slocum then filed the underlying motion to reopen his challenge to the 2008 assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a time-served sentence. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811 N.W.2d 411
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219185 - 2018-09-19
a time-served sentence. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811 N.W.2d 411
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219185 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the read-in charge. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811 N.W.2d 441 (plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21
for the read-in charge. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811 N.W.2d 441 (plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21