Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5231 - 5240 of 29936 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 116
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08

Beth Callow and Wes Callow v. Daniel Tornio and Pam Tornio
, the interpretation of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers, 86 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10317 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of an ordinance to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129283 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael Eddy v. B.S.T.V. Inc.
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
dispositive issues need be addressed). ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29869 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kevin G. Vinje
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9127 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Whether conduct constitutes harassment is a question of law that we review de novo. See Welytok v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291553 - 2020-09-29

[PDF] Carole L. Arenz v. Leo J. Bronston
a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14008 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the claims made in the motion are procedurally barred are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778370 - 2024-03-26

Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31