Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52371 - 52380 of 68885 for had.
Search results 52371 - 52380 of 68885 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss. The State moved for reconsideration, arguing Robert had erroneously represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46061 - 2010-01-19
to dismiss. The State moved for reconsideration, arguing Robert had erroneously represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46061 - 2010-01-19
State v. Tracey Leon Wheeler
in the case, or (2) the jury had before it testimony or evidence which had been improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11543 - 2005-03-31
in the case, or (2) the jury had before it testimony or evidence which had been improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11543 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of deciding the merits of the case outweighed the finality of a two-and-one-half-year-old judgment that had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113464 - 2014-06-03
of deciding the merits of the case outweighed the finality of a two-and-one-half-year-old judgment that had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113464 - 2014-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
petition, Huber argued that the 2000 revocation order was illegal because he had already completed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45264 - 2010-01-04
petition, Huber argued that the 2000 revocation order was illegal because he had already completed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45264 - 2010-01-04
State v. Justin H.
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9428 - 2005-03-31
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9428 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
the State failed to prove his prior convictions and he had not admitted the convictions as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10492 - 2005-03-31
the State failed to prove his prior convictions and he had not admitted the convictions as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10492 - 2005-03-31
State v. George F. Johnson
a continuance because he had actual notice of the State’s intent and the result of the DNA test. Had the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3507 - 2005-03-31
a continuance because he had actual notice of the State’s intent and the result of the DNA test. Had the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because Alston had been part of a new program while on probation, called the Special Investigation Unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111588 - 2014-05-05
because Alston had been part of a new program while on probation, called the Special Investigation Unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111588 - 2014-05-05
CA Blank Order
246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that they had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134540 - 2015-02-10
246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that they had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134540 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that No. 2014AP2780-CR 4 suggested Miller had violated gun safety rules, the jury could have decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21
that No. 2014AP2780-CR 4 suggested Miller had violated gun safety rules, the jury could have decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21