Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 12632 for abuse.

COURT OF APPEALS
, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse of his authority as a teacher and coach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31422 - 2008-01-07

State v. John C. VanNorman
occurring, yet the hospital staff had not reported the abuse as required by law). Here, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Choice W. E.
, consistent with the protection of the public. Wherever possible, and, in cases of child abuse and neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-year sentence was necessary if Marinko could not benefit from the substance abuse program. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Incarceration Program and the Substance Abuse Program. The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether Haasnoot’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01

Jamie L. McCallum v. Alpha Property & Casualty Insurance Company
difficulties, including some physical abuse. As a result, she left her husband in Milwaukee and moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7923 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the challenge incarceration and substance abuse programs. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30

[PDF] NOTICE
not account for the variety of crimes in that class, the twenty-five-year age gap in this case, King’s abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31422 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jack L. B.
. He argues that, although the mother denied discussing sexual abuse with her son, the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. William McElwee
and will not be upset unless there is abuse of discretion or error of law. Sensenbrenner v. Sensenbrenner, 89 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4248 - 2005-03-31