Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶15, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124. Procedural Bar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205013 - 2017-12-13
we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶15, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124. Procedural Bar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205013 - 2017-12-13
Platt Barber v. Ken Weber
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24599 - 2006-05-30
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24599 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
deficiency was prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
deficiency was prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifton Hampton
in jail. Hampton petitioned the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9084 - 2017-09-19
in jail. Hampton petitioned the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kramer Business Service, Inc. v. Hyperion, Inc.
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, while the mitigating factors were de minimis. No. 2021AP657-CR 5 In this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535788 - 2022-06-22
, while the mitigating factors were de minimis. No. 2021AP657-CR 5 In this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535788 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13
. Whether evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Mark T. Ulinski
. The trial court found both improprieties by Ulinski to be de minimus in light of the absence of actual harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3639 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court found both improprieties by Ulinski to be de minimus in light of the absence of actual harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3639 - 2005-03-31
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
interest. The interpretation of § 767.24(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
interest. The interpretation of § 767.24(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David R. Olofson
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21