Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an ordinance to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129283 - 2017-09-21
of an ordinance to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 971.31(10). We review questions involving the effect of a plea de novo. Kelty, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
. STAT. § 971.31(10). We review questions involving the effect of a plea de novo. Kelty, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
2009 WI APP 154
the appropriateness of granting or denying declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40580 - 2011-02-07
the appropriateness of granting or denying declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40580 - 2011-02-07
Racine County v. William R. Cape
is an identifiable change or expansion of a legal nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3740 - 2005-03-31
is an identifiable change or expansion of a legal nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3740 - 2005-03-31
Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31
the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to de novo review.” County of Grant v. Vogt, 2014 WI 76, ¶17, 356 Wis. 2d 343, 850 N.W.2d 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149120 - 2017-09-21
to de novo review.” County of Grant v. Vogt, 2014 WI 76, ¶17, 356 Wis. 2d 343, 850 N.W.2d 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149120 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court, and instead review the issue de novo. See Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶5, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
court, and instead review the issue de novo. See Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶5, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
[PDF]
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
enrichment.” In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3884 - 2017-09-20
enrichment.” In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3884 - 2017-09-20
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31