Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 24568 for extending.
Pierce County v. Amy F.
Almost a year later, on June 23, 2003, the CHIPS order was extended. The extension order did not alter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
Almost a year later, on June 23, 2003, the CHIPS order was extended. The extension order did not alter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to recommend a sentence consisting of ten years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839954 - 2024-08-21
to recommend a sentence consisting of ten years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839954 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. A condition of K.J.S.’s extended supervision was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251145 - 2019-12-06
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. A condition of K.J.S.’s extended supervision was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251145 - 2019-12-06
CA Blank Order
there is no arguable basis for challenging either the order extending Christopher’s Wis. Stat. ch. 51 mental health
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110369 - 2014-04-14
there is no arguable basis for challenging either the order extending Christopher’s Wis. Stat. ch. 51 mental health
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110369 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See RULE 809.32(1)(f). We reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143006 - 2017-09-21
. See RULE 809.32(1)(f). We reject the no-merit report, dismiss the appeal, and extend the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143006 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the length of extended supervision. At sentencing, the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133075 - 2017-09-21
on the length of extended supervision. At sentencing, the prosecution complied with the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133075 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision. The defense was free to argue for any sentence. The court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117693 - 2014-07-17
years’ extended supervision. The defense was free to argue for any sentence. The court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117693 - 2014-07-17
State v. Robert A. Schweiner
’ extended supervision. He characterizes the sentence as “life imprisonment with no possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7515 - 2005-03-31
’ extended supervision. He characterizes the sentence as “life imprisonment with no possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7515 - 2005-03-31
Julia K. Wleklinski v. Trostel
to extend the thirty-day time limit for such a filing set out in Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1). On October 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
to extend the thirty-day time limit for such a filing set out in Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1). On October 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
the accident. Id., ¶64. The court noted that although the driver and the sponsor were both extended coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7111 - 2005-03-31
the accident. Id., ¶64. The court noted that although the driver and the sponsor were both extended coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7111 - 2005-03-31