Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52401 - 52410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 52401 - 52410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
Prior to the sentencing hearing in this case, Highshaw was convicted in federal court of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
Prior to the sentencing hearing in this case, Highshaw was convicted in federal court of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Flores’ pleas and sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491633 - 2022-03-08
The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Flores’ pleas and sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491633 - 2022-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
damages in this case for breach of contract. Thus, BMO could not reduce its contract damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
damages in this case for breach of contract. Thus, BMO could not reduce its contract damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
rendered on the same issue and was therefore the law of the case. It is clear that the court had ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22
rendered on the same issue and was therefore the law of the case. It is clear that the court had ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31592 - 2008-01-22
City of La Crosse v. Douglas N. Hastad
., Dykman and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute over the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18669 - 2005-06-22
., Dykman and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves a dispute over the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18669 - 2005-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
omnibus claims: (1) the circuit court did not “‘apply the law to the facts of the case’”; (2) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
omnibus claims: (1) the circuit court did not “‘apply the law to the facts of the case’”; (2) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
Michael H. v. Jeffrey G. N.
affirm the orders. ¶2 This case arises out of the tragic deaths of the parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6332 - 2005-03-31
affirm the orders. ¶2 This case arises out of the tragic deaths of the parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6332 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory A. Allen
and other witnesses and failed to call witnesses who could have highlighted weaknesses in the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13713 - 2005-03-31
and other witnesses and failed to call witnesses who could have highlighted weaknesses in the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13713 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roland A. Smart
2002 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0569-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0569-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental responsibility. ¶3 The cases were tried together in a court trial. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213514 - 2018-05-30
parental responsibility. ¶3 The cases were tried together in a court trial. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213514 - 2018-05-30