Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52401 - 52410 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 52401 - 52410 of 74898 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing remarks, but followed the parties’ recommendation and withheld sentence “given the record now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
sentencing remarks, but followed the parties’ recommendation and withheld sentence “given the record now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
Dings Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
for a continuance nor the administrative law judge’s resolution of the request appear in the record. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13786 - 2014-09-15
for a continuance nor the administrative law judge’s resolution of the request appear in the record. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13786 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kevin L. C.
was ineffective for failing to preserve the record in his first appeal by including social services’ investigative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective for failing to preserve the record in his first appeal by including social services’ investigative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee A. Sutton
. At the postconviction motion hearing, counsel testified that he reviewed Sutton’s sex-related treatment records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12802 - 2017-09-21
. At the postconviction motion hearing, counsel testified that he reviewed Sutton’s sex-related treatment records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and 904.04(2) (2005-06).1 The statements, however, are not included in the record. Our understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35696 - 2014-09-15
and 904.04(2) (2005-06).1 The statements, however, are not included in the record. Our understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35696 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 403.309(2). ¶10 Here, the record contains little evidence related to OFTI’s possession of Seller Note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697276 - 2023-08-29
. 403.309(2). ¶10 Here, the record contains little evidence related to OFTI’s possession of Seller Note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697276 - 2023-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a trial court’s order denying a § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101818 - 2013-09-17
will not reverse a trial court’s order denying a § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101818 - 2013-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Derwin D. Jones
the objection. The prosecutor continued, “The evidence in the record is [the victim] says there was a knife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
the objection. The prosecutor continued, “The evidence in the record is [the victim] says there was a knife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to comply with the plan to resume visits. Fourth, the record [was] silent on the Department’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
to comply with the plan to resume visits. Fourth, the record [was] silent on the Department’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155567 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had a right to testify or not to testify. The record shows that Rickard admitted in his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10
that he had a right to testify or not to testify. The record shows that Rickard admitted in his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10