Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52491 - 52500 of 68288 for law.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to suppress evidence presents a mixed question of fact and law. See State v. Casarez, 2008 WI App 166, ¶9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232950 - 2019-01-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
, the ultimate question of whether Pickens' trial counsel was ineffective is a question of law which we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11033 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in 2011. At that time, Wisconsin law was that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140852 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Love
McGlynn Flanagan, assistant attorney general, assisted by Paul Stockhausen, law student extern. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
simply, witnesses are not infallible, and the law does not require them to be so as to their honest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
821 W. State Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 Jon Alfonso LaMendola LaMendola Law Office 375 E. Arbor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29

[PDF] State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
of appeals stated: Thus, Wisconsin law does not merely require that a defendant be personally present
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, but No. 2024AP786 5 when the exercise of that discretion turns on a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088746 - 2026-03-10

State v. Leon J. Lace
were lawful. Accordingly, the court denied Lace’s motions. Following the jury’s return of a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial to the defense are questions of law we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103670 - 2013-11-05