Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5251 - 5260 of 19223 for inmates search.
Search results 5251 - 5260 of 19223 for inmates search.
State v. Will E. Edwards
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven H. Robinson
. His plea followed the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
. His plea followed the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence on grounds of an unlawful entry and search of her home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
to suppress evidence on grounds of an unlawful entry and search of her home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Steven H. Robinson
court’s denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his residence. He argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21
court’s denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his residence. He argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
related to the officer’s testimony about the basis for the search. Upon review, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18
related to the officer’s testimony about the basis for the search. Upon review, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the vehicle, moved to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the officer lacked probable cause to search Huff.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
in the vehicle, moved to suppress the cocaine on grounds that the officer lacked probable cause to search Huff.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lacked probable cause to search Huff.3 ¶4 Huff and Officer Christopher Ottaway both testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
lacked probable cause to search Huff.3 ¶4 Huff and Officer Christopher Ottaway both testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15