Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5261 - 5270 of 15278 for 2013.

CA Blank Order
and Higginbotham, JJ. Jody Wagner, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144260 - 2015-07-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wagner has elected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
in 1999 and, at some point, was also admitted to practice law in Arizona. In 2013, this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212848 - 2018-05-16

CA Blank Order
, of burglary, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2013-14).[1] Attorney Michael Holzman has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145303 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150614 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version. No. 2014AP1995-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143666 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 The order is summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175436 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. I, § 1. They argue that the statute lacks a rational basis. ¶4 In 2013, the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122448 - 2014-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
after Mull serves two- thirds of his aggregate sentence. See WIS. STAT. § 302.11(1) (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21