Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5261 - 5270 of 6253 for cf.

[PDF] WI App 11
, the officers in this case had probable cause to obtain a search warrant. Cf. Artic, 327 Wis. 2d 392, ¶42 n.7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898192 - 2025-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the individual”); cf Perkins v. State, 61 Wis. 2d 341, 346, 212 N.W.2d 141 (1973) (noting that courts “cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977083 - 2025-07-01

[PDF] State v. Theodore J. Krawczyk
Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-417 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4842 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Leo E. Wanta
, not ineffective assistance, as Wanta suggests. Cf. State v. Felton, 110 Wis.2d 485, 329 N.W.2d 161 (1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
. Appeal Nos. 01-2789 02-2979 Cir. Ct. No. 80-CF-495 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4499 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert J. Baierl v. John McTaggart
analysis to determine whether violation renders lease unenforceable); cf. Huff & Morse, Inc., 118 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17457 - 2017-09-21

State v. Glover B. Jones
of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3996 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
, the unambiguous statutes, §§ 40.63(8)(f) and (h), leave nothing for judgment or discretion. Cf. Lister, 72
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17271 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
that the referendum failed. An individual cannot claim to be aggrieved when his or her position is successful. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 75
“because the evidence of each crime would be admissible in separate trials for each”); cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036811 - 2026-01-26