Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5261 - 5270 of 16415 for commentating.

WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP867-CR Complete Title ...
client’s character with comments about Coleman doing “all kind[s] of things in his past” and not being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139400 - 2015-05-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
into this opinion without specifically commenting on how the evidence and arguments have evolved in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582814 - 2022-10-27

[PDF] WI App 38
with comments about Coleman doing “all kind[s] of things in his past” and not being “an angel,” defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139400 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 166
to the State’s comments at the end of its initial and rebuttal closing arguments, which repeated Dr. Pierquet’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56871 - 2011-08-21

99-CV-2959 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v.
information from one female police cadet concerning sexist and racist comments and jokes told by Brenon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16526 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alfred J. Spears
sentencing. Even if we assume these comments were sufficient to preserve the issue for our review, we see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13778 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Barry D. Faber
-CR 2 properly concluded that comments Faber made to two sixteen-year-old girls did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14181 - 2014-09-15

State v. Delavago K. Moore
. The court’s comments showed Moore’s familiarity with the judicial process. Further, the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21524 - 2006-02-27

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 19-06 - Letter to Attorney Russell, Chair, Board of Administrative Oversight
the court could seek written comment and conduct a public hearing on the restitution issue, if warranted
/supreme/docs/1906commentschief.pdf - 2019-10-14

[PDF] State v. James L. Anderson
court considered the gravity of the offense. It commented that this offense was very serious because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10031 - 2017-09-19