Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52631 - 52640 of 57699 for id.

City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
that this case presents one of the exceptions.” Id. at 619. ¶11 Glass has filed no notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15972 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
to the trial court’s discretion. See id. A court properly exercises its discretion when it examines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15884 - 2017-09-21

Thomas L. Anderson v. State of Wisconsin Parole Commission
was such that the Commission might reasonably make the order or determination in question. Id. ¶7 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7294 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Emmanuel Pettis
prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” Id. A manifest necessity for the termination of the trial must exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5738 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
might reasonably be made. See id. (citation omitted). This court does not “weigh the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
information gatherer with loyalties to no one but the court.” Id. It is reasonable to view the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17

COURT OF APPEALS
errors were not previously raised. Id. at 185. ¶8 Hoeft seems to argue that sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to consider the totality of circumstances particular to the case.” Id., ¶30 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 530
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1137671 - 2026-07-01

State v. Arthur C. List
“violated or failed to comply with the law in a court of original jurisdiction.” Id. The Illinois sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7072 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Melody L. Dallman
authority” to dismiss a criminal case on nonconstitutional grounds prior to jeopardy attaching. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18131 - 2017-09-21