Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52661 - 52670 of 83961 for simple case search.
Search results 52661 - 52670 of 83961 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
of .24%. Following this incident and in a matter unrelated to this case, McCready
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
of .24%. Following this incident and in a matter unrelated to this case, McCready
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
order. Seidl claims that punitive damages were not an available remedy in this case. Seidl further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28989 - 2014-09-15
order. Seidl claims that punitive damages were not an available remedy in this case. Seidl further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28989 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
moves for dismissal based on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
moves for dismissal based on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2010AP907-CR 3 was a reasonable option in this case; counsel did not inform Hunt of this possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70955 - 2014-09-15
No. 2010AP907-CR 3 was a reasonable option in this case; counsel did not inform Hunt of this possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70955 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marvin Jost
trial be held. ¶3 Jost subsequently moved the court to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6487 - 2017-09-19
trial be held. ¶3 Jost subsequently moved the court to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6487 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason Halda
4 ¶8 In this case, the officer observed the car in which Halda was riding commit two traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2300 - 2017-09-19
4 ¶8 In this case, the officer observed the car in which Halda was riding commit two traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2300 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michelle A.H.
the evidence, the trial court addressed whether the evidence was relevant to a material issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31
the evidence, the trial court addressed whether the evidence was relevant to a material issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31
97-06 ORDERED effective January 1, 2000, SCR 20:3.6(a),(c),(c)(1),(c)3),(c)(7) are amended; 20:3.6(d)and (e) are created, and the Comment to 20:3.6 is amended. FURTHER ORDERED proposed amendment of SCR 20:3.8, is denied.
rules is amended to read: 20:3.6(c)(7) (intro.) In a criminal case, in addition to subparagraphs (1
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31
rules is amended to read: 20:3.6(c)(7) (intro.) In a criminal case, in addition to subparagraphs (1
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31