Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52671 - 52680 of 74898 for public records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1385-CRNM 2 review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640050 - 2023-04-04

State v. Arnulfo Torres
that the in camera interview be done on the record. The trial court reinterviewed the informant and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8299 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
that any and all loaded trucks could be stopped and weighed.” (Emphasis added.) The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5599 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589076 - 2022-11-15

Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
. It argues that the record fails to establish with specificity the continuity of the Lutzs' use and it shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13471 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2007-08).[1] Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40021 - 2006-03-29

[PDF] Michael L. Payne v. Judith A. Payne
interfered with his ability to participate in the trial. The record does not support that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jewel C.
” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4094 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650283 - 2023-05-03

COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing the record, this court affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Ferguson, No. 96-1164-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09