Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52671 - 52680 of 83961 for simple case search.
Search results 52671 - 52680 of 83961 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30027 - 2014-09-15
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30027 - 2014-09-15
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case returns to us after we reversed and remanded a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25307 - 2006-05-30
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case returns to us after we reversed and remanded a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25307 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
) because Cadotte was not following WIS. STAT. § 346.34. He suggests this case is resolved by statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19243 - 2017-09-21
) because Cadotte was not following WIS. STAT. § 346.34. He suggests this case is resolved by statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19243 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted, Cozetta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30027 - 2007-08-20
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted, Cozetta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30027 - 2007-08-20
CA Blank Order
was not relevant evidence in this case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102844 - 2013-10-07
was not relevant evidence in this case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102844 - 2013-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
the facts and circumstances of this case support the trial court’s decision to enter the order, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-07
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
), Stats. In each case, the counts were the sixth and sequential convictions for the respective offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10491 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. In each case, the counts were the sixth and sequential convictions for the respective offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
of .24%. Following this incident and in a matter unrelated to this case, McCready
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
of .24%. Following this incident and in a matter unrelated to this case, McCready
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15