Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 11927 for affidavit.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 11927 for affidavit.
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
until he read Williams’s affidavit at the postconviction hearing. Williams also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
until he read Williams’s affidavit at the postconviction hearing. Williams also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on June 22. That same day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
on June 22. That same day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
between the CI and Blackshear. Blackshear later submitted an affidavit in which she claimed the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280122 - 2020-08-19
between the CI and Blackshear. Blackshear later submitted an affidavit in which she claimed the CI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280122 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
MSI Preferred Services, Inc. v. Clements Agency
party’s affidavits to determine if they support a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25919 - 2017-09-21
party’s affidavits to determine if they support a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25919 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit, trial counsel told him that the State’s request for “prison” was different from a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
affidavit, trial counsel told him that the State’s request for “prison” was different from a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Although the Kalugins did not file affidavits asserting these facts and never appeared in court, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33249 - 2008-06-30
. Although the Kalugins did not file affidavits asserting these facts and never appeared in court, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33249 - 2008-06-30
Village of Deerfield v.
. Finally, Deerfield seeks frivolous-appeal costs based on an affidavit stating that Philipp’s attorney told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11781 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, Deerfield seeks frivolous-appeal costs based on an affidavit stating that Philipp’s attorney told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11781 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references the “Exhibit A” filed three weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references the “Exhibit A” filed three weeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
on an affidavit of the prior owner of his property which was filed well in advance of the trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83144 - 2012-06-05
on an affidavit of the prior owner of his property which was filed well in advance of the trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83144 - 2012-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit, sir? [OFFICER MAXWELL:] Yes. THE COURT: Thank you. Officer Maxwell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
an affidavit, sir? [OFFICER MAXWELL:] Yes. THE COURT: Thank you. Officer Maxwell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02