Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which this court decides de novo.’ The constitutionality of an ordinance is also a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129283 - 2014-11-17

Dorothy Caraher v. City of Menomonie
or denial of summary judgment is de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. M & I First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4491 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28680 - 2007-04-09

COURT OF APPEALS
minutes of testimony on the second day of trial in her absence. We review that question de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86702 - 2012-09-04

State v. Nkosi K. Brown
). The application of the facts to the constitutional principles is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4936 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WTMJ, Inc. v. Michael J. Sullivan
is documentary, we review the document de novo. Racine Educ. Ass'n v. Board of Educ., 145 Wis.2d 518, 521, 427
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10213 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law an appellate court reviews de novo. Linden v. Cascade Stone Co., 2005 WI 113, ¶5, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is de novo, but we use the same method as the circuit court. See Pinter v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be afforded relief.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶26, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466385 - 2021-12-28

2008 WI APP 86
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶33, 302 Wis. 2d 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32691 - 2008-06-24