Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52731 - 52740 of 82712 for judgment for m s.
Search results 52731 - 52740 of 82712 for judgment for m s.
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17574 - 2005-03-31
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie J. Webster
there was a brief by Frank M. Tuerkheimer and LaFollette Godfrey & Kahn, Madison. 2002 WI 100 NOTICE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17374 - 2017-09-21
there was a brief by Frank M. Tuerkheimer and LaFollette Godfrey & Kahn, Madison. 2002 WI 100 NOTICE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17574 - 2017-09-21
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17574 - 2017-09-21
Mildred R. Cermak v. Michael Swank, M.D.
, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11662 - 2005-03-31
, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
based this conclusion on J.M.’s holding that “all reports and documents that have been admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977083 - 2025-07-01
based this conclusion on J.M.’s holding that “all reports and documents that have been admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977083 - 2025-07-01
State v. Joseph J. Guerard
. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16669 - 2005-03-31
. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Guerard
by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy A. Lautenschlager
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16669 - 2017-09-21
by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy A. Lautenschlager
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Chippewa County: STEVEN H. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643679 - 2023-04-11
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Chippewa County: STEVEN H. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643679 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
State v. David E. Verhagen
violated s. 940.20(1) … while placed in a secured correctional facility. Notwithstanding subchs. IV to VI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8205 - 2017-09-19
violated s. 940.20(1) … while placed in a secured correctional facility. Notwithstanding subchs. IV to VI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8205 - 2017-09-19