Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52741 - 52750 of 82742 for judgment for m s.
Search results 52741 - 52750 of 82742 for judgment for m s.
Frontsheet
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17264 - 2005-03-31
Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 69
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37441 - 2014-09-15
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37441 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 85
and the circuit court issued a judgment and order committing him for treatment in a secure mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452402 - 2022-01-13
and the circuit court issued a judgment and order committing him for treatment in a secure mental health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452402 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 3 The petition also sought to terminate K.G.’s parental rights, but this appeal only concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789789 - 2024-04-17
. 3 The petition also sought to terminate K.G.’s parental rights, but this appeal only concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789789 - 2024-04-17
State v. Martin B., Sr.
intermarried under s. 767.60, that paternity was not adjudicated prior to the filing of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8787 - 2005-03-31
intermarried under s. 767.60, that paternity was not adjudicated prior to the filing of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8787 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin B., Sr.
intermarried under s. 767.60, that paternity was not adjudicated prior to the filing of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7982 - 2005-03-31
intermarried under s. 767.60, that paternity was not adjudicated prior to the filing of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Martin B., Sr.
or whose parents have not Nos. 94-1975 95-0765 -4- subsequently intermarried under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7982 - 2017-09-19
or whose parents have not Nos. 94-1975 95-0765 -4- subsequently intermarried under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7982 - 2017-09-19
State v. David E. Verhagen
original jurisdiction over a child who is alleged to have violated s. 940.20(1).” Section 970.032(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2005-03-31
original jurisdiction over a child who is alleged to have violated s. 940.20(1).” Section 970.032(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David E. Verhagen
violated s. 940.20(1) … while placed in a secured correctional facility. Notwithstanding subchs. IV to VI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8205 - 2017-09-19
violated s. 940.20(1) … while placed in a secured correctional facility. Notwithstanding subchs. IV to VI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8205 - 2017-09-19