Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52781 - 52790 of 82742 for judgment for m s.

[PDF] NOTICE
of physical placement and to require Michele to notify them of all M.M.C.’s school events, medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36323 - 2014-09-15

Kathleen Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
COUNTY: Walworth JUDGE: Michael S. Gibbs JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17557 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert C.
-month period following the [TPR] fact-finding hearing under s. 48.424. Section 48.415(2), Stats. (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12945 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: FRANK D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518355 - 2022-05-05

State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17574 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie J. Webster
there was a brief by Frank M. Tuerkheimer and LaFollette Godfrey & Kahn, Madison. 2002 WI 100 NOTICE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17374 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeremy J. Hanson
was argued by Kathleen M. Ptacek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17574 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. re: Proposed Maps
S. JACOBS, MARGE BOSTELMANN, AND CARRIE RIEPL, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebrief.pdf - 2024-01-22

State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
) seeks review of a published court of appeals' decision[1] affirming a circuit court's judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08