Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Donald Miller
in response. The trial court ruled that the prosecution could make no mention of pending battery charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14993 - 2017-09-21
in response. The trial court ruled that the prosecution could make no mention of pending battery charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14993 - 2017-09-21
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
the influence of an intoxicant because the Village of Walworth will continue to prosecute the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-03-31
the influence of an intoxicant because the Village of Walworth will continue to prosecute the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-03-31
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
the influence of an intoxicant because the Village of Walworth will continue to prosecute the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16010 - 2005-03-31
the influence of an intoxicant because the Village of Walworth will continue to prosecute the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16010 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Cooper
) The strength of the prosecution’s case. Most important here will be whether the Government’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
) The strength of the prosecution’s case. Most important here will be whether the Government’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
State v. Norman O. Brown
of the consequences of a plea, may justify withdrawal of the plea prior to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
of the consequences of a plea, may justify withdrawal of the plea prior to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Buckingham
, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
. The Breens filed suit against Winkel, his insurer and his law firm, alleging that the criminal prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31
. The Breens filed suit against Winkel, his insurer and his law firm, alleging that the criminal prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger P. Barber
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger P. Barber
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the prosecution regarding self-defense, O’Keefe’s affirmative defense. O’Keefe also claimed in his motion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
by the prosecution regarding self-defense, O’Keefe’s affirmative defense. O’Keefe also claimed in his motion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12