Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.

Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
by the plan following the date of divorce. Susan claims that she should receive a sum equal to 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4827 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott K. Fisher
as to the proper result in this case. We first note that the language in Cole, 264 Wis. 2d 520, ¶49, is quite
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18377 - 2005-06-01

James Cowden v. David Kadlec
believed that the CBRF had been completed by November 5 and mailed a thirty-day notice to quit or pay rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3965 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
… the log times and pull over times don’t quite add up.” Nonetheless, the trial court denied Nelis’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
No. 02-0118 2 following the date of divorce. Susan claims that she should receive a sum equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4827 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a dozen claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We conclude that none of the claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that it was in breach of contract, arguing that the trial court should have dismissed this claim under the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141374 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
this claim under the statute of frauds or that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141374 - 2015-05-12