Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, of one count of second-degree reckless homicide. Stynes also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
a jury trial, of one count of second-degree reckless homicide. Stynes also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
[PDF]
State v. Donald DeBaere
on review is whether the trial court erred in denying DeBaere’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16330 - 2017-09-21
on review is whether the trial court erred in denying DeBaere’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16330 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] Mays argues that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] Mays argues that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Barber argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Barber argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
State v. Beth LaBatte
from an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. LaBatte argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14942 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. LaBatte argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14942 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Pizzini
(1x); 961.49(1)(b)1 and (2)(a) (1995-96). ¶2 Pizzini contends: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16041 - 2005-03-31
(1x); 961.49(1)(b)1 and (2)(a) (1995-96). ¶2 Pizzini contends: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. Broad raises three arguments: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47976 - 2014-09-15
relief. Broad raises three arguments: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47976 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
motion for postconviction relief. Broad raises three arguments: (1) the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47976 - 2010-03-16
motion for postconviction relief. Broad raises three arguments: (1) the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47976 - 2010-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it determined that he was not eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30787 - 2007-11-05
that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it determined that he was not eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30787 - 2007-11-05
State v. Paul L. Bathe
of trial counsel and postconviction counsel.[1] The trial court dismissed the motion without conducting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6370 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel and postconviction counsel.[1] The trial court dismissed the motion without conducting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6370 - 2005-03-31