Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gary Hampton
Constitutions was violated when the trial court refused to voir dire a juror who was sleeping during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8521 - 2017-09-19
Constitutions was violated when the trial court refused to voir dire a juror who was sleeping during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8521 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
the prosecutor engaged in improper cross-examination and improper closing argument, whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor engaged in improper cross-examination and improper closing argument, whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that: (1) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) the State engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023384 - 2025-10-14
contends that: (1) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) the State engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023384 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Thomas S. Mayo
postconviction motion for a new trial on the grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24578 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial on the grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24578 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George Taylor
The Hon. Timothy G. Dugan presided over the trial in this matter. The Hon. Mel Flanagan decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
The Hon. Timothy G. Dugan presided over the trial in this matter. The Hon. Mel Flanagan decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Barber argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. Barber argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13448 - 2017-09-21
State v. David J. Pizzini
(1x); 961.49(1)(b)1 and (2)(a) (1995-96). ¶2 Pizzini contends: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16041 - 2005-03-31
(1x); 961.49(1)(b)1 and (2)(a) (1995-96). ¶2 Pizzini contends: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16041 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] Mays argues that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06).[1] Mays argues that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
State v. Donald DeBaere
denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The issue on review is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16330 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The issue on review is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16330 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelcey X. Nelson
PER CURIAM. Kelcey X. Nelson appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15959 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Kelcey X. Nelson appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15959 - 2005-03-31