Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58284 for us.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 58284 for us.
State v. Sheldon C. Stank
of the Oxycontin from two experts’ use of the Physician’s Desk Reference as a presumptive, pharmaceutical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20051 - 2005-12-11
of the Oxycontin from two experts’ use of the Physician’s Desk Reference as a presumptive, pharmaceutical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20051 - 2005-12-11
State v. Melvin S. Lewis
of such use must be supported by more than the mere introduction of these exhibits into evidence and the broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2389 - 2005-03-31
of such use must be supported by more than the mere introduction of these exhibits into evidence and the broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2389 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
process, the answer is the former. We reverse because the circuit court in this case used the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35567 - 2009-03-24
process, the answer is the former. We reverse because the circuit court in this case used the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35567 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
times, killing him. ¶2 Chief Edward Flynn found Manney’s use of deadly force to be justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195083 - 2017-09-21
times, killing him. ¶2 Chief Edward Flynn found Manney’s use of deadly force to be justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195083 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
was heroin, (3) the defendant knew or believed the substance was heroin, and (4) the recipient victim used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
was heroin, (3) the defendant knew or believed the substance was heroin, and (4) the recipient victim used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12308 - 2005-03-31
Certification
has statewide implications because the legal test used to resolve whether a state statute does or does
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96058 - 2013-04-24
has statewide implications because the legal test used to resolve whether a state statute does or does
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96058 - 2013-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
published after the trial—that an actuarial risk assessment tool used by the State’s experts overstated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
published after the trial—that an actuarial risk assessment tool used by the State’s experts overstated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
that the experts were not entitled to use their clinical judgment to diagnose him with pedophilia. Rather, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31
that the experts were not entitled to use their clinical judgment to diagnose him with pedophilia. Rather, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 101
the dispute before us by declining to adopt a blanket rule excluding salable professional goodwill from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52686 - 2014-09-15
the dispute before us by declining to adopt a blanket rule excluding salable professional goodwill from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52686 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
not entitled to use their clinical judgment to diagnose him with pedophilia. Rather, he argues that Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13743 - 2014-09-15
not entitled to use their clinical judgment to diagnose him with pedophilia. Rather, he argues that Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13743 - 2014-09-15

