Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52801 - 52810 of 64182 for records.
Search results 52801 - 52810 of 64182 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Ziegler
to the facts of record. See State v. Rogers, 196 Wis. 2d 817, 829, 539 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
to the facts of record. See State v. Rogers, 196 Wis. 2d 817, 829, 539 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Lintz
. THE COURT: Okay, you’ve made a record. Lintz, who is now represented by counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
. THE COURT: Okay, you’ve made a record. Lintz, who is now represented by counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the offenses, and Hammond’s prior record of harms to the public. The court focused on these factors far more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
of the offenses, and Hammond’s prior record of harms to the public. The court focused on these factors far more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
State v. Fradario L. Brim
might have reached a compromise verdict. Nothing of record suggests as much, and this contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
might have reached a compromise verdict. Nothing of record suggests as much, and this contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court based its sentence on incorrect information, the record does not support that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87973 - 2014-09-15
that the court based its sentence on incorrect information, the record does not support that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to confrontation. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2019AP1178-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
to confrontation. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2019AP1178-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Wiseman. We cannot disturb the hearing officer’s credibility determination. The record also supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
Wiseman. We cannot disturb the hearing officer’s credibility determination. The record also supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics March 2026
of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally, following
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107006 - 2026-05-11
of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally, following
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107006 - 2026-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
test. ¶4 Pike requested a record review by the circuit court on the refusal determination. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185330 - 2017-09-21
test. ¶4 Pike requested a record review by the circuit court on the refusal determination. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185330 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
hearing[.]” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1101881 - 2026-04-08
hearing[.]” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1101881 - 2026-04-08