Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52841 - 52850 of 57708 for id.
Search results 52841 - 52850 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on prejudice without considering whether the counsel’s performance was deficient. Id. at 128 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15
on prejudice without considering whether the counsel’s performance was deficient. Id. at 128 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion at sentencing. See id.; State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶17, 40-43, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
discretion at sentencing. See id.; State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶17, 40-43, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
id.; see also State v. Sveum, 2010 WI 92, ¶16, 328 Wis. 2d 369, 787 N.W.2d 317. The same two-part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867171 - 2024-10-29
id.; see also State v. Sveum, 2010 WI 92, ¶16, 328 Wis. 2d 369, 787 N.W.2d 317. The same two-part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867171 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion. Id. The record reveals that the court considered and applied the relevant sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
discretion. Id. The record reveals that the court considered and applied the relevant sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion. Id. The record reveals that the court considered and applied the relevant sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
discretion. Id. The record reveals that the court considered and applied the relevant sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
for the failure to allege or adequately raise the issue in the original motion. Id. at 181-82, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12649 - 2017-09-21
for the failure to allege or adequately raise the issue in the original motion. Id. at 181-82, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Id., ¶6. Pautz argues that even if the evidence supports the existence of an ownership agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
. Id., ¶6. Pautz argues that even if the evidence supports the existence of an ownership agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See id., ¶46 (postconviction motion for plea withdrawal must allege that the defendant did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
. See id., ¶46 (postconviction motion for plea withdrawal must allege that the defendant did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the facts of each case. Id. at 587. “Reasonable diligence” is treated as a finding of fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259168 - 2020-05-06
on the facts of each case. Id. at 587. “Reasonable diligence” is treated as a finding of fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259168 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requiring disqualification. Id. at 663-64. ¶9 The statutory paragraph at issue does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18
requiring disqualification. Id. at 663-64. ¶9 The statutory paragraph at issue does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18