Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 531 - 540 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 531 - 540 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
County of Jefferson v. Christopher D. Renz
there was probable cause for the arrest. At the motion hearing Judge Ullsvik sustained an objection to the officer’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17328 - 2005-03-31
there was probable cause for the arrest. At the motion hearing Judge Ullsvik sustained an objection to the officer’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17328 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith E. Pischke
of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment and an order Full Name JUDGE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8536 - 2005-03-31
of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment and an order Full Name JUDGE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8536 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
arrest and his inculpatory statement to the police;[3] and (2) present evidence and witnesses to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
arrest and his inculpatory statement to the police;[3] and (2) present evidence and witnesses to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and that 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31823 - 2014-09-15
, and that 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31823 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe ... that the defendant was operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102717 - 2013-10-07
of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe ... that the defendant was operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102717 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Milwaukee County: JOSEPH R. WALL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32434 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: JOSEPH R. WALL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32434 - 2014-09-15
State v. Will E. Edwards
the arresting officer acts should be resolved in his [or her] favor.”). The collective knowledge of the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
the arresting officer acts should be resolved in his [or her] favor.”). The collective knowledge of the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen R. Stocki
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
complains that the police found the marijuana as the result of an illegal arrest.1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
complains that the police found the marijuana as the result of an illegal arrest.1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13762 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kevin E. Daugherty
foundation. ¶2 We conclude that the arresting officer’s initial investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25256 - 2006-05-23
foundation. ¶2 We conclude that the arresting officer’s initial investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25256 - 2006-05-23