Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5301 - 5310 of 15278 for 2013.
Search results 5301 - 5310 of 15278 for 2013.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2013-14). All references to Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2013-14). All references to Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
following the Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013). The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
following the Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013). The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
CA Blank Order
. Jones’ appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
. Jones’ appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143123 - 2015-06-16
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1]; see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2015-07-28
to withdraw as appellate counsel. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1]; see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156184 - 2017-09-21
seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156184 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Arroyo’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165187 - 2017-09-21
. Arroyo’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165187 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155580 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2013-14) 3 is a question of law we review independently. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163235 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2013-14) 3 is a question of law we review independently. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the property in question shall be classified as provided in WIS. STAT. ch. 766 (2013-14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156974 - 2017-09-21
that the property in question shall be classified as provided in WIS. STAT. ch. 766 (2013-14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156974 - 2017-09-21