Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5301 - 5310 of 44087 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Biaya Kitchen Set Bahan Partikel Premium Aston Pluit Jakarta Utara.
Search results 5301 - 5310 of 44087 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Biaya Kitchen Set Bahan Partikel Premium Aston Pluit Jakarta Utara.
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
accepted. The court in Gallion, while reaffirming the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
accepted. The court in Gallion, while reaffirming the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary, recognized “a greater need to articulate on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
the sentencing principles set forth in McCleary, recognized “a greater need to articulate on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hough indicated to the court throughout the colloquy that he understood the information set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
. Hough indicated to the court throughout the colloquy that he understood the information set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by evaluating Jennifer’s motion according to the standard for custody modifications set forth in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
by evaluating Jennifer’s motion according to the standard for custody modifications set forth in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
Annette B. Brudnowski v. John M. Brudnowski
the amount due her under the child support formulas authorized in § 767.25(1j), Stats., and set forth in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11971 - 2005-03-31
the amount due her under the child support formulas authorized in § 767.25(1j), Stats., and set forth in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11971 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
. 1989). The issue of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
. 1989). The issue of whether a set of facts constitutes a “new factor” for sentencing purposes presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
State v. William J. Ludwig
as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
potential error would not constitute a new factor. ¶4 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66789 - 2011-06-27
potential error would not constitute a new factor. ¶4 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66789 - 2011-06-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶37-38. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶37-38. A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William J. Ludwig
for substantial battery as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15313 - 2017-09-21
for substantial battery as a repeater. His parole eligibility date was set for December 1999, and his mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15313 - 2017-09-21