Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
that retrial is not barred when a defendant requests a mistrial is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
that retrial is not barred when a defendant requests a mistrial is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
dismissed. Both parties state that we should consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58995 - 2014-09-15
dismissed. Both parties state that we should consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58995 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 154
the appropriateness of granting or denying declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40580 - 2011-02-07
the appropriateness of granting or denying declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40580 - 2011-02-07
Christina Holman v. Family Health Plan
of law, and we review the trial court’s determination de novo. See Anderson, 160 Wis.2d at 397, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12517 - 2005-03-31
of law, and we review the trial court’s determination de novo. See Anderson, 160 Wis.2d at 397, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12517 - 2005-03-31
Harris v. Lynelle S. Turenske
(1980). Our review is de novo. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis.2d 737, 748, 470 N.W.2d 625, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9650 - 2005-03-31
(1980). Our review is de novo. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis.2d 737, 748, 470 N.W.2d 625, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, such as the interpretation of an insurance policy, the standard of review is de novo. Talley v. Mustafa, 2018 WI 47, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088746 - 2026-03-10
, such as the interpretation of an insurance policy, the standard of review is de novo. Talley v. Mustafa, 2018 WI 47, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088746 - 2026-03-10
State v. Leon J. Lace
(1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standards regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31
(1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standards regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Verkuilen alleged the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law we review de novo. Id. ¶10 Verkuilen alleged the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22